World

IAAF re-analysis unearths 28 cheats from Helsinki 2005 and Osaka 2007

IAAF’s long-term storage and retesting strategy first revealed six adverse findings from Helsinki 2005 in March 2013 and a second reanalysis in April 2015 confirms a further 28 athletes with 32 adverse findings.

London 2012 unveil Anti-Doping Laboratory with laboratory service providers GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) and laboratory operators Kings College London

The IAAF’s long-term storage and retesting strategy concerning IAAF Championships which began in 2005 with the storage of anti-doping samples from that year’s IAAF World Championships in Helsinki has led to disciplinary action being commenced against a further 28 athletes following a second reanalysis.

In 2012, the IAAF conducted a first round of re-analysis of urine samples taken at the Helsinki World Championships which had been proactively stored by the IAAF at the Swiss Laboratory for Doping Analyses (LAD), the WADA-accredited laboratory in Lausanne, in anticipation of new scientific developments.

This strategy first revealed six adverse findings from Helsinki which were announced in March 2013 and to date 9 athletes have been sanctioned following re-testing of samples from various world championships.

Beginning in April 2015, using the latest technology available in the field of anti-doping and taking advantage of the new World Anti-Doping Code’s provision extending from 8 to 10 years the period during which samples can be tested, the IAAF made a second reanalysis of Helsinki 2005 and Osaka 2007 samples.

This reanalysis has confirmed a further 28 athletes with 32 adverse findings. Due to the legal process, none of these athletes can be named yet.

A large majority of the 28 are retired, some are athletes who have already been sanctioned, and only very few remain active in sport. The IAAF is provisionally suspending them and can confirm that none of the athletes concerned will be competing in Beijing.

The IAAF embarked on this long-term storage and retesting strategy in 2005 to ensure that clean athletes are ultimately rewarded for their honest efforts in IAAF competitions.

The IAAF is committed to use every means at its disposal within the World Anti-Doping Code to root out the cheats, however long it takes.

Martial Saugy, Associate Professor, PhD, Life Sciences, and Director of LAD commented:

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

“The latest scientific breakthroughs in anti-doping technology and analysis have been employed in the reanalysis of these samples to allow us to find previously undetectable substances.

“We are at the cutting edge of the fight against doping. In our 10-year partnership with the IAAF we have been using every scientific advance and legal opportunity at our disposal to catch the cheats.

“The IAAF and the IOC, working in cooperation with the LAD, clearly showed the way 10 years ago and other anti-doping organisations and sport federations, on WADA’s recommendation, are now considering or have started implementing such a retesting policy.”

You May Also Like

World

The role of the World Athletics commissions is to provide expertise and to advise the World Athletics Council

Anti-Doping

The World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) signs agreement with the Commonwealth Games Federation in lead up to the 22nd Commonwealth Games in Birmingham.

Anti-Doping

WADA will hold elections into the newly established 20-member Athlete Council in August to further enhance athlete representation within the World Anti-Doping Agency.

World

World Athletics launches Global Conversation about the future of the sport - What you need to know.

©2004-2024 All Rights Reserved / Powered by Yomog Sports + Media | AthleticsAfrica.com is the leading source for track and field athletics, road and mountain running news, events information, analysis, results, images and videos from Africa.

Exit mobile version